![]() We first highlight the problem of alterity or othering as a central feature of these nations’ reactions to the mass migration challenge represented by that conflict. Throughout the chapters of this book, several cross-cutting themes or phenomena appear to have played vital, if varying, roles in government and popular responses to the mass displacement and migration prompted by the Syrian Civil War and we emphasize those here. You can download the book free of charge from E-International Relations. “I think it’s a feeble attempt to justify the stealing of millions if not billions of IPs that make up AI generated art,” he says.This is an excerpt from Policy and Politics of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Eastern Mediterranean States, edited by Max O. He is also sceptical of the company’s scheme to disperse revenue to artists from AI image sales. If websites like Shutterstock and others that offer licensed assets for graphic design use start allowing AI into their libraries, it’ll be akin to having sewer water leak into the drinking supply,” he says. I pay fees for licensing and use completely royalty-free images. “I work a lot with photo manipulation art. He disagrees with Shutterstock selling AI-generated art and believes it risks ostracising photographers and illustrators. It is often difficult to determine what input data was referenced to create any one piece of output.Īdrian Alexander Medina, editor of literary website and magazine Aphotic Realm and a creator of book covers, says he has lost three potential clients to AI-generated art since the start of October. OpenAI didn’t respond to a request for comment, but the Shutterstock spokesperson said that a deal had been struck in which the AI that produces the pictures has been trained only on images from Shutterstock’s archives, rather than on content found elsewhere online.Ĭontributors whose work was used to train the models will receive a share of royalties from AI sales, said the Shutterstock spokesperson, but they didn’t say what percentage of revenue would go to contributors or how the contributions would be divided. Who should own the copyright on AI-generated artwork? “When the work of many contributed to the creation of a single piece of AI-generated content, we want to ensure that the many are protected and compensated (instead of allowing an individual to generate and take full credit for that content),” they said. The two companies will also launch what the Shuttershock spokesperson called the Shutterstock Contributor Fund to “compensate artists for their contributions” and provide royalties when their intellectual property (IP) is used. A Shutterstock spokesperson told New Scientist that the company would continue to ban people generally from uploading AI-generated art to its platform, but that its collaboration with OpenAI was an attempt to embrace new technology in an ethical way. Shutterstock was one of several photo agencies that began removing AI-generated art from their archives last month. Both companies say that human creators whose work inspired the AI will be compensated, but one artist describes the move as “sewer water leak into the drinking supply”. The AI images will be powered exclusively by OpenAI’s DALL-E 2 software. Photo licensing service Shutterstock will begin selling images generated by artificial intelligence alongside those created by humans. The Shutterstock image agency will now sell AI-generated images from just one AI
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |